Scientific opinion, access to release areas, and other logistical challenges led the Service to plan a: hard release (wolves captured, transported, and immediately released with a minimum of holding, handling, and expense) of young adult wolves in Idaho and a soft release (wolves acclimated in pens for weeks or months before release) of family groups in YNP.The Canadian source areas were situated along the Rocky Mountains and had similar terrain and prey to the YNP and central Idaho release locations. Officials in Alberta and British Columbia offered wolves for reintroduction.A reintroduction plan was developed in the summer and fall of 1994.Babbitt in 1994, provided for wolf restoration while allowing management flexibility to deal with concerns of the local public. This approach, approved by Secretary of the Interior Bruce E.

In it, the Service proposed that wolves be reintroduced into both YNP and central Idaho and designated as 'nonessential experimental populations' pursuant to Section 10(j) of the ESA, 16 U.S.C. During the preparation of the EIS, over 130 public meetings were held and some 170,000 comments were received from the public. Forest Service to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on wolf reintroduction into YNP and Idaho. In late 1991, Congress directed the Service to work with the National Park Service and the U.S. Achievement of this goal would be followed by removal of the gray wolf from ESA protection in the NRM region of the United States. The recovery goal was ten breeding pairs of wolves in each of the three recovery areas (northwestern Montana (NWMT), central Idaho (CID), and the Greater Yellowstone Area (GYA)) for three successive years. other measures (presumably reintroduction) would be instigated in central Idaho if two breeding pairs had not naturally established there by 1992.reintroduction of wolves designated 'nonessential experimental' in Yellowstone National Park (YNP) and.promotion of natural recovery in northwestern Montana.In 1987, the Service developed a revised and more specific recovery plan that recommended:

Department of the Interior appointed a wolf recovery team, which initially recommended that natural dispersal and reintroduction be used to restore wolves to the Northern Rocky Mountain (NRM) region. Fish and Wildlife Service (FSW) of the U.S. In 1974, the remaining gray wolves in the lower 48 states were protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Protection under Endangered Species Act and Plan for Natural Dispersal and Reintroduction Reproduction did not resume in the western United States until 1986, when dispersing wolves from Canada denned in Montana. A few wolves, apparently long-range dispersers from Canadian populations, were periodically killed in these States. By the 1930s, wolf populations had disappeared from Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. Gradually, wolves were extirpated from the contiguous 48 states except Minnesota. Wolves, like other large predators in North America, were persecuted shortly after colonization by Europeans began and throughout the settlement period. If this data is unavailable or inaccurate and you own or represent this business, click here for more information on how you may be able to correct it.The gray wolf ( Canis lupus) once occupied nearly all of North America. VIEW ADDITIONAL DATA Select from over 115 networks below to view available data about this business.

Grey wolf express email